The Theory of Groups by Hans J. Zassenhaus

By Hans J. Zassenhaus

Important, well-written graduate point textual content designed to acquaint the reader with group-theoretic equipment and to illustrate their usefulness as instruments within the answer of mathematical and actual difficulties. Covers such topics as axioms, the calculus of complexes, homomorphic mapping, p-group conception and extra. Many proofs are shorter and extra obvious than older ones.

Show description

Read or Download The Theory of Groups PDF

Similar group theory books

Representations of Groups: A Computational Approach

The illustration idea of finite teams has visible speedy progress lately with the advance of effective algorithms and laptop algebra platforms. this can be the 1st booklet to supply an advent to the standard and modular illustration idea of finite teams with certain emphasis at the computational facets of the topic.

Groups of Prime Power Order Volume 2 (De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics)

This is often the second one of 3 volumes dedicated to hassle-free finite p-group idea. just like the 1st quantity, enormous quantities of significant effects are analyzed and, in lots of circumstances, simplified. very important subject matters offered during this monograph comprise: (a) category of p-groups all of whose cyclic subgroups of composite orders are general, (b) class of 2-groups with precisely 3 involutions, (c) proofs of Ward's theorem on quaternion-free teams, (d) 2-groups with small centralizers of an involution, (e) type of 2-groups with precisely 4 cyclic subgroups of order 2n > 2, (f) new proofs of Blackburn's theorem on minimum nonmetacyclic teams, (g) class of p-groups all of whose subgroups of index p² are abelian, (h) class of 2-groups all of whose minimum nonabelian subgroups have order eight, (i) p-groups with cyclic subgroups of index p² are categorized.

Group Representations, Ergodic Theory, and Mathematical Physics: A Tribute to George W. Mackey

George Mackey was once a rare mathematician of serious strength and imaginative and prescient. His profound contributions to illustration idea, harmonic research, ergodic concept, and mathematical physics left a wealthy legacy for researchers that maintains at the present time. This e-book is predicated on lectures provided at an AMS distinctive consultation held in January 2007 in New Orleans devoted to his reminiscence.

Extra info for The Theory of Groups

Sample text

Hence K' will satisfy the requirements of our Proposition. We let Cr denote a primitive r-th root of unity. 3 RECIPROCITY LAW 47 Suppose F is odd. The field is a compositum of bhe field Q(C4) and a (1—1) over At a finite has has degree (F— 1) over the completion of prime p this implies that By a local result (left to reader) it follows that the degree Q,,} — oo as n cc. Since this degree is a power oft, we can find an it such that this degree is divisible by P at a given finite set of finite primes, as desired.

Let n be a pitne. Let k(ç/&) = K be any given Kttmmer extension of degree n. 4 = kD1, and for which the associated field K1 happens to be K. Before proving this lemma we indicate right away how the second inequality follows from it. Since 4 = k*Di C N2J2) = 1. By . N2J2 we have (4: the first inequality this implies that "2 = k. The last line of Lemma 2 reads now k*N1J1) ( [K1 : k] and this is the second inequality since K = K1. ) . (4: PaooF OF LEMMA 3. Let be a finite set of primes containing • allp I n and all archimedean primes, • allpIa(whichmakesaan Si-unit), • enough primes so as to have 1k = k4'.

Let it be a prime. If n = p, the proff of the second inequality *c above) shows that, under the isomorphism of Theorem 6, a universal norm corresponds to an element of the Galois group which leaves fixed every cyclic extension of degree p, and is therefore a p-th power. We may therefore assume that it $ p. This puts us In the situation of Section 3. Then D1 = We go back to Lemma 2. We let 52 be the empty set, S = x flpqsUp = Js. Hence A1 = k5 and K1 = We also have = J. 12 it follows from the first inequality that = fl k and hence A2 = K2 = k.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.36 of 5 – based on 24 votes