By W. K. Nicholson, M. F. Yousif

This ebook presents an basic, whole account of quasi-Frobenius jewelry at a degree permitting researchers and graduate scholars to realize access to the sector. a hoop is named quasi-Frobenius whether it is "right" or "left" selfinjective, and "right" or "left" artinian (all 4 combos are equivalent). The learn of those jewelry grew out of the idea of representations of a finite team as a gaggle of matrices over a box, and the current quantity of the idea is wide-ranging.

**Read Online or Download Quasi-Frobenius Rings PDF**

**Similar group theory books**

**Representations of Groups: A Computational Approach **

The illustration concept of finite teams has noticeable fast progress lately with the advance of effective algorithms and laptop algebra structures. this can be the 1st booklet to supply an creation to the standard and modular illustration idea of finite teams with distinctive emphasis at the computational features of the topic.

**Groups of Prime Power Order Volume 2 (De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics)**

This is often the second one of 3 volumes dedicated to uncomplicated finite p-group conception. just like the 1st quantity, hundreds of thousands of significant effects are analyzed and, in lots of circumstances, simplified. very important themes provided during this monograph contain: (a) type of p-groups all of whose cyclic subgroups of composite orders are general, (b) category of 2-groups with precisely 3 involutions, (c) proofs of Ward's theorem on quaternion-free teams, (d) 2-groups with small centralizers of an involution, (e) type of 2-groups with precisely 4 cyclic subgroups of order 2n > 2, (f) new proofs of Blackburn's theorem on minimum nonmetacyclic teams, (g) type of p-groups all of whose subgroups of index pÂ² are abelian, (h) class of 2-groups all of whose minimum nonabelian subgroups have order eight, (i) p-groups with cyclic subgroups of index pÂ² are categorised.

**Group Representations, Ergodic Theory, and Mathematical Physics: A Tribute to George W. Mackey**

George Mackey used to be a rare mathematician of serious strength and imaginative and prescient. His profound contributions to illustration thought, harmonic research, ergodic thought, and mathematical physics left a wealthy legacy for researchers that keeps this present day. This ebook relies on lectures offered at an AMS particular consultation held in January 2007 in New Orleans devoted to his reminiscence.

**Extra resources for Quasi-Frobenius Rings**

**Sample text**

We may assume that τ¯ π¯ = 0. ¯ with T a right ideal of S. ¯ Let Proof. As S¯ is regular, let π¯ S¯ ⊕ τ¯ S¯ ⊕ T = S, 2 ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ S. By hypothesis, we may η¯ = η¯ be such that τ¯ S = η¯ S and π¯ S ⊕ T = (1 − η) assume that η2 = η in S. Note that η¯ π¯ = 0. Then γ = τ + τ η(1 − τ ) satisﬁes ¯ Moreover, γ¯ = η¯ γ 2 = γ , γ τ = τ , and τ γ = γ , so τ M = γ M and τ¯ S¯ = γ¯ S. because τ¯ η¯ = η¯ and η¯ τ¯ = τ¯ . Hence γ¯ π¯ = η¯ π¯ = 0, so replacing τ by γ proves Claim 1. By Claim 1 we have τ π ∈ J (S), so writing K = ker (τ π ), we have K ⊆ess M by hypothesis.

Observe ﬁrst that µK = µ(α K ⊕ β K ) = α K , so K ∩ µE 1 ⊆ µK = α K ⊆ K ∩ µE 1 . Hence K ∩ µE 1 = α K ⊆ ker (β). Now suppose that x ∈ ker (α) ∩ βµE 1 , say x = βµe1 where e1 ∈ E 1 . Then αβ(µe1 ) = 0, so µe1 ∈ ker (αβ) = K . Then µe1 ∈ K ∩ µE 1 ⊆ ker (β) and so 0 = βµe1 = x. This proves Claim 2. Write ι : βµE 1 → E 1 for the inclusion map in the diagram. Since E 1 is injective there exists λ ∈ end(E 1 ) such that βµ = λαβµ on E 1 . 31) and µ2 = µ ∈ end(E 1 ), and observe that τi j (M j ) ⊆ Mi for i = j because Mi is M j -injective.

Hence η ∈ J (S), so η¯ = 0. This proves the Claim. 14 Quasi-Frobenius Rings ¯ Since ⊕i π¯ i S¯ ⊆ T it sufﬁces (by the We can now show that T ⊆ess π¯ S. ¯ Let 0 = τ¯ ∈ T. Since ⊕i π¯ i S¯ ⊆ T it follows Claim) to show that T ⊆ π¯ S. ¯ ⊆ess τ¯ S. ¯ ⊆ τ¯ S¯ ∩ π¯ S¯ ⊆ τ¯ S, ¯ so we have ¯ Also, τ¯ S¯ ∩ (⊕i π¯ i S) that τ¯ S¯ ∩ (⊕i π¯ i S) ess ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ τ¯ S ∩ π¯ S ⊆ τ¯ S. But τ¯ S ∩ π¯ S is generated by an idempotent ( S¯ is a regular ¯ In particular, τ¯ ∈ π¯ S, ¯ as required. ring) so it follows that τ¯ S¯ ∩ π¯ S¯ = τ¯ S.