Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice by Jonathan Osborne, Anna MacPherson, Alexis Patterson, Evan

By Jonathan Osborne, Anna MacPherson, Alexis Patterson, Evan Szu (auth.), Myint Swe Khine (eds.)

Argumentation—arriving at conclusions on a subject matter via a means of logical reasoning that comes with debate and persuasion— has lately emerged as a important subject of debate between technology educators and researchers. there's now a company and basic trust that fostering argumentation in studying actions can advance scholars’ serious considering and reasoning abilities, and that dialogic and collaborative inquiries are key precursors to an engagement in medical argumentation. it's also reckoned that argumentation is helping scholars assimilate wisdom and generate advanced which means. The consensus between educators is that concerning scholars in clinical argumentation needs to play a severe function within the schooling technique itself. fresh research of study tendencies in technology schooling shows that argumentation is now the main commonly used examine subject within the literature. This ebook makes an attempt to consolidate modern pondering and learn at the position of clinical argumentation in schooling.

Perspectives on clinical Argumentation brings jointly widespread students within the box to proportion the sum in their wisdom concerning the position of clinical argumentation in instructing and studying. Chapters discover clinical argumentation as a method of addressing and fixing difficulties in conceptual switch, reasoning, knowledge-building and the merchandising of medical literacy. Others interrogate subject matters similar to the significance of language, discursive perform, social interactions and tradition within the school room. the fabric during this booklet, which good points intervention stories, discourse analyses, classroom-based experiments, anthropological observations, and design-based learn, will tell theoretical frameworks and altering pedagogical practices in addition to motivate new avenues of research.

Show description

Read or Download Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research PDF

Best research books

Research Agendas in EU Studies: Stalking the Elephant (Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics)

Prime students discover the complicated questions bobbing up from the continued transformation of Europe in the course of the deepening and widening results of eu integration. in response to authoritative analyses, the publication takes account of the various nationwide, transnational and foreign techniques and contexts during which eu integration has turn into embedded.

Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research

Argumentation—arriving at conclusions on a subject matter via a strategy of logical reasoning that incorporates debate and persuasion— has in recent times emerged as a important subject of dialogue between technological know-how educators and researchers. there's now an organization and common trust that fostering argumentation in studying actions can boost scholars’ serious considering and reasoning abilities, and that dialogic and collaborative inquiries are key precursors to an engagement in medical argumentation.

Ciba Foundation Symposium 134 - Research and the Ageing Population

This overseas symposium makes a speciality of the contributions that biomedical learn is making to the supply of right healthiness deal with the expanding numbers of aged humans in all nations, constructed and constructing. contemporary, encouraging advancements within the components of malignancy, dementia, osteoporosis, and heart problems are emphasised.

Extra resources for Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research

Sample text

Environmental Literacy Council and the National Science Teachers Association. (2007). Global climate change: Resources for environmental literacy. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Erduran, S. (2008). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. ), S. Erduran & M. P. ), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 47–69). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation.

Arlington, VA: NSTA Press. Erduran, S. (2008). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. ), S. Erduran & M. P. ), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 47–69). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Providence, RI: Foris. Greeno, J. , & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42, 9–23.

A simple tutorial improved students’ argumentative reasoning on a physics problem, conducted in dyads. Specifically students tended to consider more factors and constraints in their reasoning and produced better developed arguments and explanations. Chin and Osborne (2010) used question prompts (King, 1990) to help high-school students generate questions regarding puzzling aspects of a scientific experiment (and about missing information and applicable conditions). The authors presented qualitative evidence that this questioning produced richer and more productive argumentation.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 43 votes