By Hans Reiter

Those notes provide an account of modern paintings in harmonic research facing the analytical foundations of A. Weil's concept of metaplectic teams. it truly is proven that Weil's major theorem holds for a category of services (a yes Segal algebra) greater than that of the Schwartz-Bruhat services thought of by way of Weil. the theory is derived right here from a few normal effects approximately this type which appears to be like a slightly typical one within the context of Weil's conception. No past wisdom of the latter is thought, besides the fact that, and the idea is built the following, step-by-step; additional, a whole dialogue of the Segal algebra involved is given, with references to the literature. Weil's metaplectic teams are a bit more straightforward to enquire whilst the attribute isn't 2; the case of attribute 2 provides a few specific beneficial properties that are absolutely mentioned. New difficulties that come up are indicated.

**Read Online or Download Metaplectic Groups and Segal Algebras PDF**

**Best group theory books**

**Representations of Groups: A Computational Approach **

The illustration idea of finite teams has visible fast development lately with the improvement of effective algorithms and computing device algebra structures. this is often the 1st booklet to supply an creation to the normal and modular illustration conception of finite teams with unique emphasis at the computational facets of the topic.

**Groups of Prime Power Order Volume 2 (De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics)**

This can be the second one of 3 volumes dedicated to basic finite p-group concept. just like the 1st quantity, enormous quantities of significant effects are analyzed and, in lots of circumstances, simplified. very important subject matters provided during this monograph comprise: (a) type of p-groups all of whose cyclic subgroups of composite orders are common, (b) type of 2-groups with precisely 3 involutions, (c) proofs of Ward's theorem on quaternion-free teams, (d) 2-groups with small centralizers of an involution, (e) class of 2-groups with precisely 4 cyclic subgroups of order 2n > 2, (f) new proofs of Blackburn's theorem on minimum nonmetacyclic teams, (g) class of p-groups all of whose subgroups of index pÂ² are abelian, (h) type of 2-groups all of whose minimum nonabelian subgroups have order eight, (i) p-groups with cyclic subgroups of index pÂ² are categorized.

**Group Representations, Ergodic Theory, and Mathematical Physics: A Tribute to George W. Mackey**

George Mackey was once a rare mathematician of significant strength and imaginative and prescient. His profound contributions to illustration idea, harmonic research, ergodic thought, and mathematical physics left a wealthy legacy for researchers that maintains this present day. This publication relies on lectures offered at an AMS exact consultation held in January 2007 in New Orleans devoted to his reminiscence.

**Extra resources for Metaplectic Groups and Segal Algebras**

**Sample text**

Certain d i f f i c u l t i e s arise when V^ is r e s t r i c t e d but not basic and we w i l l use the followin g notation. For V^ r e s t r i c t e d w r i t e V i = V i s <3 V ^ , where V^ = V^ s unless X has type B n ; C n , F 4 ; or G2, w i t h p = 2 , 2 ; 2 ; 3 ; respectively. 6) ( so V^ s is basic and V^ is p-basic ). We w i l l sometimes w r i t e V i ~ to indicate one of V^; V^ s ; or V^1. For each r € Tt(Y)-Tt(Ly) we define a certain normal subgroup K y ^ of P Y ; which in most cases is just the largest normal subgroup of Py which is contained in Qy and does not contain the T y - r o o t corresponding to - r .

Then the weights of V are X a , X^-a, X a - a : - 2 £ ; \ - 2 a - 2 J 3 . If rf(L) = { a } , then we see there are no weights of Q-level 1. 4). ,Qk and let Q* = Q^ X ... X Qk. Then f o r d > 0, [Q* d , V i S L . ® [Q k d k, V k ] , the sum ranging over sets of nonnegative integers d ^ , . . +d k = d. Proof. It w i l l suffice to establish the result f o r k = 2. Clearly, 30 GARYM. SEITZ [ Q l d l , y±l ® [ Q 2 d 2 , V 2 ] < [ Q d l + d 2 , Vj_ ® V 2 ] . For just use d] elements f r o m Qj_, followed by d 2 elements f r o m Q 2 , and take commutators.

V k ] = (**) 2 ( v i ® . . ®V| < ) Mow (mod M). [ Q ; [ Q * d " 1 , V 0 ] ] = S is T - i n v a r i a n t , so S+M is a sum of T - w e i g h t spaces and we consider the sum of t e r m s in the r i g h t side of (**) corresponding to a fixed weight. ®V k ), where ] r qj = j s q^ for each pair of term s in the sum. and so j r ^ js. (***) For r ^ s, q* ^ qi Letting t vary we conclude each summand in ( * * * ) is in S+M. It f o l l o w s that r + M € S + M. This shows [ Q , ^ 1 ^ ] ] = [Q* d ,V 0 ] (mod M).